These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10311789)
1. A challenge to examine the meaning of living and dying. Bresnahan JF; Drane JF Health Prog; 1986 Dec; 67(10):32-7, 98. PubMed ID: 10311789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dissenting opinions: biting the hands that won't feed. Rothenberg LS Health Prog; 1986 Dec; 67(10):38-45, 99. PubMed ID: 10311790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Catholic positions on withholding sustenance for the terminally ill. McCartney JJ Health Prog; 1986 Oct; 67(8):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of a nutrient feeding tube and the need for a living will. Squillace SE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():253-80. PubMed ID: 10312081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients? Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3082798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nutrition and hydration as elective therapy: Brophy and Jobes from an ethical and historical perspective. Derr PG Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 3091528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial feeding--solid ground, not a slippery slope. Steinbrook R; Lo B N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 3122046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reclaiming our moral tradition. Catholic teaching calls us to accept the limits of medical technology. Nairn TA Health Prog; 1997; 78(6):36-9, 42. PubMed ID: 10174484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brophy v New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Brief amicus curiae, Society for the Right to Die, Inc. on behalf of appellant. J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jul; 35(7):669-78. PubMed ID: 3584770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Care of the dying: a Catholic perspective. Part II: Social and political context--Catholic providers must exemplify a caring community. Catholic Health Association. Health Prog; 1993 Apr; 74(3):16-21, 41. PubMed ID: 10124672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill. Brodeur D Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal, moral concerns in life-support treatment decisions. Kassekert R Health Prog; 1984 Sep; 65(8):44-9, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10317515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When is medical treatment "futile"? Bennett AJ Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Principles in regard to withholding or withdrawing artificially assisted nutrition/hydration. McHugh JT Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 2114380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone? Cranford RE Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]