These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312111)

  • 1. Case-mix, severity systems provide DRG alternatives.
    Pass T
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1987 Jul; 41(7):74-6, 78, 80-2. PubMed ID: 10312111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring severity: how sick is sick? How well is well?
    Horn SD
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Oct; 40(10):21, 24-32. PubMed ID: 10311666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring severity of illness to predict patient resource use within DRGs.
    Horn SD; Sharkey PD
    Inquiry; 1983; 20(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 6229481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case-mix differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
    Goldfarb MG; Coffey RM
    Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 2951336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring severity of illness: a comparison of interrater reliability among severity methodologies.
    Thomas JW; Ashcraft ML
    Inquiry; 1989; 26(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 2533174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility and validity of International Classification of Diseases based case mix indices.
    Yang CM; Reinke W
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 6():125. PubMed ID: 17022827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring severity of illness: six severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations.
    Thomas JW; Ashcraft ML
    Inquiry; 1991; 28(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 1826495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing between tertiary and secondary facilities: a case study of cardiac diagnostic-related groups (DRGs).
    Rouse P; Arulambalam A; Correa R; Ullman C
    N Z Med J; 2010 May; 123(1314):49-54. PubMed ID: 20581912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A primer on patient classification systems and their relevance to ambulatory care.
    Arbitman DB
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Sep; 57(9):31-41. PubMed ID: 10311678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA.
    Shen Y
    Med Care; 2003 Jun; 41(6 Suppl):II103-10. PubMed ID: 12773832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality measurement & severity systems: an overview.
    Wieners W
    Comput Healthc; 1988 Oct; 9(10):27, 29, 31-2. PubMed ID: 10289856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality of medical database to valorize the DRG model by ISA cost indicators].
    Holstein J; Taright N; Lepage E; Razafimamonjy J; Duboc D; Feldman L; Hittinger L; Lavergne T; Chatellier G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Dec; 50(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 12515929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two systems to measure the severity of illness.
    Feinglass J; Scherubel JC; Swartz JA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jul; 59(7):34-8. PubMed ID: 10312545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All patient refined-diagnostic related group and case mix index in acute care palliative medicine.
    Lagman RL; Walsh D; Davis MP; Young B
    J Support Oncol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 17410814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving DRGs. Use of procedure codes for assisted respiration to adjust for complexity of illness.
    Hughes JS; Lichtenstein J; Magno L; Fetter RB
    Med Care; 1989 Jul; 27(7):750-7. PubMed ID: 2501596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case mix management in context.
    King H
    Comput Healthc; 1988 Feb; 9(2):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10312362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The severity of illness index: an interview with Susan D. Horn.
    Horn SD
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Mar; 3(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10311010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.