209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312391)
1. Effects of selected fee schedule options on physicians' Medicare receipts.
Christensen S
Health Care Financ Rev; 1987; 9(2):25-37. PubMed ID: 10312391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicare physician fee schedules: issues and evidence from South Carolina.
Juba DA
Health Care Financ Rev; 1987; 8(3):57-67. PubMed ID: 10312116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of services received under Medicare by specialty of physician.
Pine PL; Gornick M; Lubitz J; Newton M
Health Care Financ Rev; 1981 Sep; 3(1):89-116. PubMed ID: 10309476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AAFP (American Academy of Family Physicians): specialty differentials should be dropped.
Graham R; Sweeney R
Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10303291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The tinkering with RBRVS begins.
Kirchner M
Med Econ; 1989 Aug; 66(15):104-8, 110, 113-6 passim. PubMed ID: 10303734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Specialty differentials: are they needed in a physician payment system?
Reardon TR
Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10303294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare physician payment reform. An introduction to the new fee system and its implications for hospitals.
Higgins W
Hosp Top; 1991; 69(3):10-3. PubMed ID: 10114804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using physician time and complexity to identify mispriced procedures.
Cromwell J; Mitchell JB; Rosenbach ML; Stason WB; Hurdle S
Inquiry; 1989; 26(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 2523347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the Medicare fee schedule on payments to physicians.
Levy JM; Borowitz MJ; Jencks SF; Kay TL; Williams DK
JAMA; 1990 Aug; 264(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 2197451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the impact. The Medicare fee schedule.
Dempsey WS
Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician payment reform: implications for physicians and hospitals.
Holahan J
Front Health Serv Manage; 1989; 6(1):3-37; discussion 38-9. PubMed ID: 10313201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ASIM (American Society of Internal Medicine): balancing the need for specialty differentials.
Olson DR
Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the implementation of physician-payment reform.
Hsiao WC; Dunn DL; Verrilli DK
N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr; 328(13):928-33. PubMed ID: 8446140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resource-based RVS (relative value scale) could change physician payments.
Konka K
Med Group Manage J; 1988; 35(6):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 10303022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare physician payment, participation, and reform.
Burney I; Hickman P; Paradise J; Schieber G
Health Aff (Millwood); 1984; 3(4):5-24. PubMed ID: 6442259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Specialty differentials, limited license practitioners, and Medicare's new fee schedule.
Soroka M; Barresi BJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Oct; 63(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 1430743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician losses from Medicare and Medicaid discounts: how real are they?
Cromwell J; Burstein P
Health Care Financ Rev; 1985; 6(4):51-68. PubMed ID: 10311339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The new law on Medicare's payments to physicians.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1247-52. PubMed ID: 2183054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carrier discretionary practices and physician payment under Medicare Part B: a preliminary report.
Muller C; Otelsberg J
Med Care; 1979 Jun; 17(6):650-66. PubMed ID: 376967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician payment reform: an idea whose time has come.
Lee PR; Ginsburg PB
JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(16):2441-3. PubMed ID: 3050173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
