These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312486)

  • 1. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
    Thomas P
    Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
    Iinuma T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
    Finucane TE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
    van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
    Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
    J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-cost mass screening with mammography as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer.
    McLelland R
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 3306771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammoscam.
    Randal J
    N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building upon assumptions. An Office of Technology Assessment report examines breast cancer screening for women over 65.
    Tsuchiyama S
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Sep; 10(9):19-20, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10115528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward effective application of efficacious cancer control interventions.
    Urban N; Thompson B; Pasket E
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():39-51. PubMed ID: 3118390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Where is free preventive mammography?].
    Gericke D
    Fortschr Med; 1989 Mar; 107(7):16-7. PubMed ID: 2496014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
    Koch MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting calculations aside.
    Meyer CR
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):2. PubMed ID: 14719607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.