213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312495)
1. The effects of DRG targeting on the radiology department.
McGraner RC
Radiol Manage; 1986 Apr; 8(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 10312495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parallel planning: a key to successful DRG phase-in management.
Keege J; Jollie W
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10310481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Managing DRGs: knowing what to cut--and when.
Keefe J; Dubé P; Jollie W
Radiol Manage; 1983 Sep; 5(4):2-6. PubMed ID: 10310300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How hospital medical record departments can benefit from retrospective DRG review.
Small P
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 10113165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiology: before and after DRGs.
Conway JB
Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 10310482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A strategy for radiologists dealing with DRGs.
Deffebach RR; Moorefield JM
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 10310727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of prospective payment under DRGs for hospital marketing.
Folland S; Ziegenfuss JT; Chao P
J Health Care Mark; 1988 Dec; 8(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 10312785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting the most out of DRGs.
Mohlenbrock WC
Group Pract J; 1985; 34(5):27-32. PubMed ID: 10311974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Autopsy diagnoses can increase DRG reimbursement.
Holmes J; Baer DM
Pathologist; 1986 Sep; 40(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10311733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathology practice under TEFRA and DRGs.
Breckenridge RL
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 10310298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeons living under DRGs.
Glenn JF
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1986 Jul; 71(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10311593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologists mobilize against DRGs.
Herman JG
Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):119-25. PubMed ID: 10310874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
Atkinson G; Murray R
J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of flat-rate payment in radiation oncology. German experience with disease-related groups for inpatient funding in radiation oncology].
Glocker S; Loskamp N; Bamberg M; Roeder N
Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 16703284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N
Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coping with DRGs.
Bennewate RM
Radiol Manage; 1986; 8(4):42-3. PubMed ID: 10311815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical and operational issues concerning DRGs and the prospective payment system.
Ertel PY; Harrison RV
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):10-31. PubMed ID: 10310488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How DRGs are changing the hospital's information needs.
Nackel JG
Trustee; 1984 May; 37(5):24, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10310576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Capital costs and DRGs--caveat emptor!
Keefe J
Radiol Manage; 1984 Mar; 6(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10273493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
