These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312561)
1. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A challenge to examine the meaning of living and dying. Bresnahan JF; Drane JF Health Prog; 1986 Dec; 67(10):32-7, 98. PubMed ID: 10311789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Compassionate withholding of feeding: are physicians protected? Champlin L Geriatrics; 1987 Jan; 42(1):37-40, 42. PubMed ID: 3100397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues. Snyder L J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding/withdrawing artificial feeding: legal status. Rouse F New Physician; 1987; 36(4):55-6. PubMed ID: 10312084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal dilemma of stopping artificial feeding. Blum JD Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1990; 7(3):42-8. PubMed ID: 2113822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone? Cranford RE Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to refuse medical treatment: where there is a right, there ought to be a remedy. Wilborn SE North KY Law Rev; 1998; 25(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 16437814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan. Rouse F Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The dissenting opinions: biting the hands that won't feed. Rothenberg LS Health Prog; 1986 Dec; 67(10):38-45, 99. PubMed ID: 10311790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Nov; 9(5):7-30. PubMed ID: 10284752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards for nutrition support: hospitalized patients. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract; 1988 Feb; 3(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 3131644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]