These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312751)

  • 1. Complete Health, Seako team up for UR software.
    Hagin D
    Contract Healthc; 1988; ():16-7. PubMed ID: 10312751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IPA-model HMO overcomes growing pains with JBI MIS--Blue Choice.
    Hagin D
    Contract Healthc; 1988; ():18-9. PubMed ID: 10312753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambulatory software improves QA, UR and claims processing.
    Johnson J
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Oct; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10291185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-option offerers look for complex DP systems.
    Knutson T; Alt SJ
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Oct; ():22-4. PubMed ID: 10291183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An HMO takes charge of its claims processing.
    Walker L
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1987 Dec; 4(12):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10312625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IPAs emerge on the HMO forefront.
    Welch WP
    Bus Health; 1988 Feb; 5(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 10312358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value Health focuses on pretreatment intervention.
    Levick D
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Oct; ():16-7. PubMed ID: 10291181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A national perspective on UR (utilization review).
    Korn AM
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10113119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AIDS in the San Francisco bay area: the experience of an IPA model HMO.
    Chernov AJ
    GHAA J; 1987-1988 Winter; 8(2):4-16. PubMed ID: 10312480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Claiming benefits. Claims adjudication enhancements fight fraud, reduce abuse and contain cost, which add up to a bigger bottom line.
    Jacobs A
    Healthc Inform; 2007 Jun; 24(6):111. PubMed ID: 17591121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior review programs broadened.
    Zoler ML
    Med World News; 1989 May; 30(9):67. PubMed ID: 10293411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic clinical logic revamps medical management.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Jan; 2(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10345348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of care new focus for precert programs.
    Weisman E
    Hospitals; 1990 Apr; 64(7):51-2. PubMed ID: 2312097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can you meet these IPA performance benchmarks?
    Capitation Manag Rep; 1998 Mar; 5(3):42-4. PubMed ID: 10178026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of local UR (utilization review).
    Amos WL
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10113125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is private utilization review?
    Pavuk A
    Trustee; 1990 Mar; 43(3):11. PubMed ID: 10104181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Provider profiling keeps care up and costs down.
    O'Connor M
    Infocare; 1995 May; ():24, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10142485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life cycle of a data warehousing project in healthcare.
    Verma R; Harper J
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2001; 15(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 11452573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Claims in, approvals out--in seconds.
    Larkin H
    Med Econ; 2001 Jul; 78(13):28-30, 36. PubMed ID: 11478174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keep the UR monitors off your back.
    Solomon GL
    Med Econ; 1993 Oct; 70(19):55-6, 59-60, 62. PubMed ID: 10129286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.