436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10312887)
21. Managed care contracts. Dangerous liaisons?
Diosegy AJ
N C Med J; 1990 Oct; 51(10):534-6. PubMed ID: 2243561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of capitated and fee-for-service remuneration on physician decision making in gynecology.
Redwine DB
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):482. PubMed ID: 8752263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Using diagnostic clusters to evaluate patterns of treatment and develop capitation rates.
Cave DG
Empl Benefits J; 1995 Mar; 20(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 10142516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of reimbursement on medical decision making: do physicians alter treatment in response to a managed care incentive?
Melichar L
J Health Econ; 2009 Jul; 28(4):902-7. PubMed ID: 19395103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Independent assessment is key to financial well-being.
Karling J; Pyper T
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Feb; 53(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 10345621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Profile network performance to manage contact capitation.
Capitation Manag Rep; 1999 May; 6(5):72-7. PubMed ID: 10537873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spending time with patients: the impact of organizational structure on medical practice.
Wolinsky FD; Marder WD
Med Care; 1982 Oct; 20(10):1051-9. PubMed ID: 7132466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transition to capitation. Core competencies for physician practice success.
Estes ML
Physician Exec; 1997 Jan; 23(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10164292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. National Academy of Neuropsychology/Division 40 of the American Psychological Association Practice Survey of Clinical Neuropsychology in the United States. Part II: Reimbursement experiences, practice economics, billing practices, and incomes.
Sweet JJ; Peck EA; Abramowitz C; Etzweiler S
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Aug; 18(6):557-82. PubMed ID: 14591431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new physician's guide to evaluating managed care opportunities.
Molloy P
Am J Manag Care; 1999 Feb; 5(2):207-14; quiz 215-6. PubMed ID: 10346516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How not to lose your private patients to corporate choices.
Olson DR
Consultant; 1987 May; 27(5):75-6, 78. PubMed ID: 10312712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fewer patient visits under capitation offset by improved quality of care: study brings evidence to debate over physician payment methods.
Eikel CV
Find Brief; 2002 Sep; 5(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12442752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Here's what's coming--like it or not.
Terry K
Med Econ; 1998 Apr; 75(8):72, 77-9, 83-4 passim. PubMed ID: 10179484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Policy implications of physician income homeostasis.
Bernstein J
J Health Care Finance; 1998; 24(4):80-6. PubMed ID: 9612740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Should fee-for-service group practices develop a prepaid component?
Shouldice RG
Med Group Manage; 1981; 28(1):54, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10250275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Utilization control in HMOs.
Debrock L; Arnould RJ
Q Rev Econ Finance; 1992; 32(3):31-53. PubMed ID: 10122876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reading the fine print: tips of negotiating an HMO provider agreement.
Hirsch WR
J Oncol Manag; 1998; 7(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 10179003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Ethical evaluation of "retainer fee" medical practice.
Needell MH; Kenyon JS
J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 15915848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Networks need not build a physician comp program entirely from scratch.
Hardy T
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1995 Jan; 4(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10152425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Physician bonuses: tarnished awards?
Marcille JA
Manag Care; 1994 Mar; 3(3):14-8, 24. PubMed ID: 10140026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
