These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10313108)

  • 1. After RVS fails, you'll love office-based DRGs.
    Kaiser LR
    Med Econ; 1989 Jun; 66(11):22-3, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10313108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The RB-RVS challenge. An opportunity for equality.
    Ogrod ES
    Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 10303708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Don't feud over the RVS.
    Boyle JF
    Internist; 1988 Jan; 29(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 10302064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. And the research continues...
    Wilensky GR
    Internist; 1985; 26(5):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10311172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use and misuse of relative value scales under Medicare.
    Scott JS
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 10303855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delighted FPs plan RVS push.
    Bankhead CD
    Med World News; 1988 Nov; 29(21):76-7. PubMed ID: 10302875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare payment reform. Recommendations of the Physician Payment Review Commission.
    Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):18-9, 64. PubMed ID: 10303706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RVS (relative value scale) would have modest impact on fees.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Nov; 18(48):4. PubMed ID: 10303031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the impact. The Medicare fee schedule.
    Dempsey WS
    Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Washington report: the RB/RVS physician payment reform proposal: riding high but will it fly?
    Lewin ME
    J Med Pract Manage; 1989; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 10303850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Here's what RBRVS will really do to your income.
    Stevens C
    Med Econ; 1989 May; 66(10):19-20, 22, 24 passim. PubMed ID: 10303563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician Payment Review Commission issues 1989 annual report.
    Parks P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 Aug; 74(8):8-12. PubMed ID: 10303703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RVS of relative value to health care consumers.
    Boyle JF
    Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(4):88. PubMed ID: 2644163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RVS will bring changes in hospital utilization.
    Solovy AT
    Hospitals; 1988 Sep; 62(17):36, 40. PubMed ID: 3044959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Special report. On the front line of MD payment reform.
    Ginsburg P
    Part B News; 1989 Jul; 3(7):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10324945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical care reimbursement: ACR RVS(American College of Radiology Relative Value Scale) close to implementation; Harvard study in the midst of its second phase.
    Tilyou S
    J Nucl Med; 1989 Mar; 30(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 2661746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congress packs RVS, volume controls, mandatory billing, overvalued procedures and more into FY 90 budget law.
    Part B News; 1989 Dec; 3(16):suppl 1-6. PubMed ID: 10304075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis by the numbers: what's between the lines can be critical.
    Benso L
    Patient Acc; 1989 Sep; 12(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10313334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foreign experiences relevant to Medicare.
    Glaser WA
    Consultant; 1988 May; 28(5):104-7, 111. PubMed ID: 10302402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many questions surround the issue of physician DRGs.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1987 Aug; 72(8):23-4, 33. PubMed ID: 10312150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.