These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10313132)

  • 1. Cost justification.
    Inamura K
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):41. PubMed ID: 10313132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologic information management systems. System costs and savings.
    Choplin RH; Boehme JM; Park WC; Maynard CD; Williams RC
    Appl Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-9, 33. PubMed ID: 10286573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coming online for better business. Cost justifying an RIS for the smaller hospital.
    Swearingen R
    Adm Radiol; 1989 Apr; 8(4):46-9. PubMed ID: 10313068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PACS cost justification: an industry perspective.
    Hindel R
    Med Inform (Lond); 1990; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 2115614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiology information systems are worth their cost.
    Johnson RL
    US Healthc; 1988 Sep; 5(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 10291036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiology information systems. A tool for improving efficiency and reducing cost.
    Melcher C
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1986 Oct; 3(10):67-8. PubMed ID: 10278539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backloading records: the problems and solutions.
    Bruce G
    Aust Hosp; 1986 Nov; (113):10-1. PubMed ID: 10281562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A financial analysis of digital image acquisition for portable and table-top radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10291951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Justifying radiology management systems.
    Swearingen R
    US Healthc; 1988 Sep; 5(9):58. PubMed ID: 10291038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost finding in the diagnostic imaging service.
    Mobilia G
    Rays; 1998; 23(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 9689857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The radiation oncology production process model.
    Sternick ES
    Adm Radiol; 1987 Oct; 6(10):35-7. PubMed ID: 10284780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can you justify the cost of installing PACS?
    Healthc Inform; 1992 Mar; 9(3):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10117889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Cheshire Cat of medical imaging.
    Vanden Brink J
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 10293543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PACS at Hokkaido University.
    Miyasaka K; Irie G
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):40-1. PubMed ID: 10324649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Japanese move ahead with PACS.
    Akisada M
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):40. PubMed ID: 10293547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contemporary computerization of the radiology department.
    Kilmartin JK
    Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):4-9. PubMed ID: 10311994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of the cost effectiveness and impact of RTAS radiology reporting system.
    Bentley EA
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):15-8. PubMed ID: 10309435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivendor phased approach: an alternative route to PACS.
    Smith EM; Wandtke JC; Robinson AE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jan; 21(1):55-7, 59-60. PubMed ID: 11692386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical imaging: merging picture archives and communications.
    Spilker C
    Inform; 1987 Mar; 1(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 10281392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.