313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10314322)
1. Congressional rites of passage for the rights of alcoholics.
Lewis JS
Alcohol Health Res World; 1988; 12(4):240-51. PubMed ID: 10314322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Your money or their lives. Patient advocates are learning from AIDS activists how to work the system.
Thompson D
Time; 1992 Oct; 140(15):66-8. PubMed ID: 10121154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The National Alcohol Research Centers Program.
Pawlowski A
Alcohol Health Res World; 1988; 12(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 10314323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Service programs get small funding gains; research funds grow.
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Jan; 49(1):121. PubMed ID: 9444696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The federal interest in nursing research. A summary of the research programs of the Division of Nursing, Bureau of Health Manpower Education; the National Institutes of Health, and the Health Services and Mental Health Administration.
Gortner SR
Nurs Res Conf; 1973; (9):419-24. PubMed ID: 4378072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science and politics. The background and the issues surrounding the controversial proposal for a National Institute of Nursing.
Jacox AK
Nurs Outlook; 1985; 33(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 3845455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidentiality of research grant protocols.
Morgan TE; Keyes JA; Sherman JF
Clin Res; 1976 Jan; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10277868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing science. House votes to kill grants, limit travel to meetings.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5691):1688. PubMed ID: 15375232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Washington Report. NIH: with friends like that..
Greenberg DS
N Engl J Med; 1980 Jun; 302(26):1490-2. PubMed ID: 7374726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Outlining a new path for research.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1996 Mar; 28(13):713, 716. PubMed ID: 10155832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomedical warfare.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1997 Feb; 29(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 10172898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institute of Medicine study offers little support for transfer of ADAMHA research to NIH.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1991 Oct; 42(10):1077. PubMed ID: 1660026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis and comment on the Report of the President's Biomedical Research Panel.
J Med Educ; 1976 Nov; 51(11):965-75. PubMed ID: 185386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research priorities. Healy attacks US budgeting system.
Mervis J
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6370):555. PubMed ID: 1560833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH begins review of studies that were questioned at a congressional hearing.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(11):A24. PubMed ID: 15287135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research funding. Cuts coming on overheads.
Anderson C
Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6320):642. PubMed ID: 2023623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Organizational history of HSMHA.
Sims LB
Health Serv Rep; 1973 Feb; 88(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 4358689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whither federal support for research? HEW has a plan . . . and needs your help.
Plum F
Ann Neurol; 1978 Jul; 4(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 697335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal policy in biomedical research: the report of the President's Biomedical Research Panel.
Marks PA
Fed Proc; 1976 Dec; 35(14):2536-8. PubMed ID: 186330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
