133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10314552)
1. Antipsychotic drugs and involuntarily committed patients.
Reed GA; Hoffman WE
Hosp Med Staff; 1982 May; 11(5):16-21. PubMed ID: 10314552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the right to refuse treatment in a forensic patient population: six-month review.
Miller RD; Bernstein MR; Van Rybroek GJ; Maier GJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 2758115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
Binder RL; McNiel DE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication. State laws.
Arkin HR
JAMA; 1984 Nov; 252(18):2620-1. PubMed ID: 6149323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
Ledwith DM
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: preliminary empirical findings and comparisons.
Hoge SK; Gutheil TG; Kaplan E
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2893647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment refusal among forensic inpatients.
Young JT; Bloom JD; Faulkner LR; Rogers JL; Pati PK
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 3427230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to refuse treatment and the abolition of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7225582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The involuntarily confined mentally ill: can they refuse antipsychotic medication?
Root GL; Scarano RM
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(3):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10314659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
Goff ML
Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to refuse treatment issues still far from settled.
Freishtat HW
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1981 May; 1(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7298893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
Blais NR
St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Law-medicine notes. The right to psychiatric treatment: a "simple decision" in the Supreme Court.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(10):487-8. PubMed ID: 1152864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right to refuse treatment: impact of Rivers v. Katz.
Ciccone JR; Tokoli JF; Clements CD; Gift TE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 2372578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
