These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10314552)

  • 21. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
    Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Right to refuse treatment by the involuntary patient: medico-legal considerations].
    Morrison D
    Can J Psychiatry; 1985 Feb; 30(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 3971283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Landmark?: United States Supreme Court recognized the issue of the constitutional rights of civilly committed mental patients.
    Brown A
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 10246882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Update on legal issues associated with tardive dyskinesia.
    Slovenko R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2000; 61 Suppl 4():45-57. PubMed ID: 10739331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The right to treatment of the institutionalized mentally ill in the United States].
    Kitamura F; Fujinawa A
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1992; 94(5):487-501. PubMed ID: 1513912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cichon DE
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Supreme Court and madness: a middle ground on proof of mental illness for commitment.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Aug; 301(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 450018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
    Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Involuntarily committed patients' constitutional right to refuse treatment. A challenge to psychology.
    White MD; White CA
    Am Psychol; 1981 Sep; 36(9):953-62. PubMed ID: 7283251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The constitutional right to refuse antipsychotic medications.
    Brooks AD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(2):179-221. PubMed ID: 6114763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
    White AB
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of judicial review of patients' refusal to accept antipsychotic medications at the Minnesota Security Hospital.
    Farnsworth MG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1674892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication.
    Arkin HR
    JAMA; 1983 May; 249(20):2784-5. PubMed ID: 6133017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The scope of the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs: an analysis of the least restrictive alternative doctrine.
    Dudzik CJ
    Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):101-48. PubMed ID: 11658466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.