These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10314552)

  • 41. Guardian's authority to involuntarily hospitalize the incompetent ward.
    Sullivan JL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 4(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 1027505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.
    Bursztajn H; Chanowitz B; Kaplan E; Gutheil TG; Hamm RM; Alexander V
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 1685680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Geriatric, psychiatric, and legal aspects of the mental state of the aged.
    Lange DJ
    Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():161-74. PubMed ID: 10252823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The basis for the right of committed patients to refuse psychotropic medication.
    Hermann DH
    J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Jun; 22(6):176-85, 194, 199. PubMed ID: 10296704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?
    Taylor-Dunn K
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1987-1988; 23(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 11659065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment.
    Wellsch T
    Sask Law Rev; 1983-1984; 48(2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11658817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patient rights versus patient needs: who decides?
    Sadoff RL
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 44(6 Pt 2):27-32. PubMed ID: 6853466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Supreme Court rules mentally ill prison inmates may be involuntarily medicated.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 May; 41(5):572. PubMed ID: 11642773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Right to refuse treatment: a new approach.
    Freishtat HW; Einhorn AH
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1981 Jan; 1(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 7298881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
    Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The right of patients in mental hospitals to refuse drug treatment.
    Buchwald W; Lazorishak K
    Health Matrix; 1986; 4(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10314629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
    Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. View from the nation's courts.
    Freishtat HW
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1989 Dec; 9(6):436-7. PubMed ID: 2574195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.