461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10314902)
1. A model for evaluating the clinical skills of respiratory therapy personnel.
Block AS
Respir Care; 1978 Mar; 23(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10314902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
Riordan J
Respir Ther; 1981; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How formal appraisal systems work.
Pucilo NP
Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Faculty performance evaluation: the CIPP-SAPS model.
Mitcham M
J Allied Health; 1981 Nov; 10(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 7328038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for evaluating department managers.
Schoenhard WC
Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):60-2. PubMed ID: 689658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A method of work performance appraisal at the Pediatric Department in Levoca].
Ivicic L; Kacejová R
Cesk Pediatr; 1987 Mar; 42(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 3581272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
Scott S
Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
Goodykoontz L
Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Making the performance assessment process work for you.
Lombardi DN
Adm Radiol; 1988 Apr; 7(4):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10287386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
Cunningham CV
Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance skill evaluations for i.v. nurses.
Czapracki DM
J Intraven Nurs; 1989; 12(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 2723873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chart auditing.
Rowe RM
Emerg Med Serv; 1983; 12(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 10260780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A program for technologist rejection rate using the home computer.
Cottrell GA
Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10281498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Productivity monitoring of the non-technical staff.
Fodor J; Salvekar A
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 10281128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staff evaluation.
Swartz AJ
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Feb; 36(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 420206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
Yager E
Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Appropriateness of job assignments.
Cronin MP
Respir Ther; 1977; 7(2):49-51, 62. PubMed ID: 10305712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
