These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10315503)

  • 1. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term case mix management with linear programming.
    Hughes WL; Soliman SY
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 10310979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.
    Panniers TL; Tomkiewicz ZM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Feb; 11(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 3920601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Horn SD; Bulkley G; Sharkey PD; Chambers AF; Horn RA; Schramm CJ
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Jul; 313(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3923354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
    Muldoon JH
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.
    Mendenhall S
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):62-8. PubMed ID: 10311154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological limitations in case mix hospital reimbursement, with a proposal for change.
    Williams SV; Kominski GF; Dowd BE; Soper KA
    Inquiry; 1984; 21(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 6232213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hospital's financial future: DRGs and beyond.
    Beck DF
    Health Care Superv; 1985 Jan; 3(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What impact will DRGs have on group practice?
    Nisenfeld JJ
    Med Group Manage; 1983; 30(5):50-2, 56-8, 60 passim. PubMed ID: 10310248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selected bibliography and glossary on DRG's prospective pricing.
    Hatfield D
    Ther Recreation J; 1984; 18(4):56-61. PubMed ID: 10318580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
    Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data quality. An illustration of its potential impact upon a diagnosis-related group's case mix index and reimbursement.
    Doremus HD; Michenzi EM
    Med Care; 1983 Oct; 21(10):1001-11. PubMed ID: 6418985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How DRGs are changing the hospital's information needs.
    Nackel JG
    Trustee; 1984 May; 37(5):24, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10310576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician DRGs.
    Mitchell JB
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Sep; 313(11):670-5. PubMed ID: 3927164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians and DRGs: survival under PPS.
    Jessee WF; Suver JD
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Apr; 13(4):2-6. PubMed ID: 10310572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reimbursement under DRGs: implementation in New Jersey.
    Davies RH; Westfall G
    Health Serv Res; 1983; 18(2 Pt 1):233-47. PubMed ID: 6409841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel planning: a key to successful DRG phase-in management.
    Keege J; Jollie W
    Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10310481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are national DRG rates the best choice for PPS?
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Aug; 39(8):62-6. PubMed ID: 10311204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.