These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10315719)

  • 1. A simple dosimeter for bronchial provocation testing using a solid-state electronic timing module.
    Thomson DB; Clanton TL
    Respir Care; 1986 Dec; 31(12):1204-6. PubMed ID: 10315719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of oscillometry as a measure of airway responsiveness in asthmatic children after histamine and methacholine bronchoprovocation with dosimeter-MedicAid and DeVilbiss nebulizers.
    Kopriva F; Szotkowská J; Plocová A; Závodská J; Zápalka M; Smatanová D; Látalová M; Slezáková L; Radová L
    J Asthma; 2007 May; 44(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 17530524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bronchial challenge: a small reservoir for the Wright jet nebulizer.
    Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Frølund L; Svendsen UG; Weeke B
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1987; 23(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 3593997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of driving pressure and nebulizer model on aerosol output during intermittent delivery with a dosimeter.
    Alkins SA; Hurwitz KM; Sierra A
    J Aerosol Med; 2002; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12006140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in nebulizer aerosol output and weight output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Chinn S; Arossa WA; Jarvis DL; Luczynska CM; Burney PG
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Feb; 10(2):452-6. PubMed ID: 9042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge.
    Hendeles L; Khan YR; Shuster JJ; Spencer T
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Nov; 120(5):1218-9. PubMed ID: 17637473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.
    Dennis JH; Avery AJ; Walters EH; Hendrick DJ
    Eur Respir J; 1992 Nov; 5(10):1279-82. PubMed ID: 1486976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An aerosol generator system for inhalation delivery of pharmacologic agents.
    Strong AA; Hazucha MJ; Lundgren DA; Cerini ER
    Med Instrum; 1987 Jun; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 3302633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes of nebulizer output over the years.
    Merkus PJ; van Essen-Zandvliet EE; Parlevliet E; Borsboom G; Sterk PJ; Kerrebijn KF; Quanjer PH
    Eur Respir J; 1992 Apr; 5(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 1563507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A set-up for bronchial provocation by continuously generated aerosols.
    Moldovan D; Gliga M; Simon L; Boga F; Jazigian A
    Rom J Intern Med; 1994; 32(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 7613504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.
    Cockcroft DW; Hurst TS; Gore BP
    Chest; 1989 Sep; 96(3):505-8. PubMed ID: 2486186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.
    Khan YR; McDonough P; Cockcroft DW; David BE; Hendeles L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Oct; 116(4):924-6. PubMed ID: 16210072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Oct; 10(10):2436-7. PubMed ID: 9387980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method for measuring aerosol nebulizer output using radioactive tracers.
    Gatnash AA; Chandler ST; Connolly CK
    Eur Respir J; 1998 Aug; 12(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 9727803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical evaluation of the Mefar dosimeter.
    Ward RJ; Liakakos P; Leonard RF; Reid DW; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1999 Aug; 14(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 10515425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Technical aspects in the Pari provocation test I].
    Mohorn M; Schäfer R
    Pneumologie; 1991 Aug; 45 Suppl 2():651-3. PubMed ID: 1946271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of dosimeter calibration method on nebulizer output.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Smycniuk AJ; Cockcroft DW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Jan; 94(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 15702815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterizing Nebulizer Performance for Methacholine Challenge Tests.
    Coates A; Culver B; Cockcroft D; Hallstrand T; Haynes J; Kaminsky D; MacIntyre N; Wanger J
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2018 Oct; 198(8):988-990. PubMed ID: 30160985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.
    Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW; Hannah VD; Davis BE
    Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16381617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.