These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Operating is fun but does the knife cure? ]. Karumo I Duodecim; 1997; 113(17):1621, 1623, 1625. PubMed ID: 10650629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining costs and cost-effectiveness of epilepsy. van Hout B Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4(9 Suppl):S501-9. PubMed ID: 10185987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Costs and potential values of teleconference systems in routine surgery]. Gnann W; Kretschmer R; Schächinger U; Nerlich M Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():647-9. PubMed ID: 9574230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Money matters: what to look for in an economic analysis. Dijksman LM; Poolman RW; Bhandari M; Goeree R; Tarride JE; Acta Orthop; 2008 Feb; 79(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18283565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Modern surgery management is interdisciplinary, medically and economically responsible]. Ochel UA Chirurg; 2007 May; Suppl():155-6. PubMed ID: 18062033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of surgery in small acute 'local' hospitals. Soper J; Jones JJ Community Med; 1985 Nov; 7(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 3937654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Can we afford operations?]. Seitsalo S; Roine R Duodecim; 2000; 116(19):2053-4. PubMed ID: 12017724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Waiting lists for surgery are expensive--depending on how we calculate. No calculation method is without controversies]. Norlund A Lakartidningen; 2003 Apr; 100(16):1416-8. PubMed ID: 12756708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and economic assessment of new surgical technologies. Fendrick AM J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (19):57-60. PubMed ID: 7577207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Letter to T. A. Angerpointner, "Ambulatory surgery--indications, results and limits"]. Bölefahr H Chirurg; 1992 Nov; 63(11):Suppl 222. PubMed ID: 1458980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies. Dunham MH; Hunt VB Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision for basal cell carcinoma of the face. Otley CC Arch Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 142(9):1235; author reply 1235-6. PubMed ID: 16983019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The use and value of third surgical opinions. McCarthy EG; Tucker J; Astor L Health Cost Manage; 1987; 4(3):12-9. PubMed ID: 10317900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a surgical second opinion program. Schachter M; Oppenheimer G; Cannoodt L; Sieverts S QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Jan; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6403901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]