246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10316736)
1. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
Rosensaft J
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
George R
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What's new with institutional review boards?
Stone PW
Appl Nurs Res; 2001 Aug; 14(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 11481596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The decline of NIH's peer-review system?
Hecht F
N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov; 301(19):1068. PubMed ID: 492248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. College expresses concern on fetal research legislative proposals.
J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 4546436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tales of informed consent: four years on an institutional review board.
Bartolo
Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):193-245. PubMed ID: 10124879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review promotes professional growth.
Patterson P
OR Manager; 1992 Feb; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10116555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
Himmelsbach CK
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer participation in hospital department review.
Peters DS
Hosp Adm (Chic); 1975; 20(2):8-15. PubMed ID: 10294905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Half-full or half-empty? Evaluating IRB performance.
Mishkin B; Ariand N
Prof Ethics Rep; 1998; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11657925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution, structure and function of the institutional review board.
Prentice ED; Zetterman RK
Nebr Med J; 1983 Sep; 68(9):293-5. PubMed ID: 6633743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research on the profession of nursing. Ethical inquiry.
Gortner SR
Annu Rev Nurs Res; 1985; 3():193-214. PubMed ID: 3893476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Institutional Review Board: a case study of no-risk decisions in health-related research.
Gortner SR; Heath E; Sanders P
Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 6906010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating risks and benefits in AIDS vaccine and drug trials.
Kessel E
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):186-8. PubMed ID: 11650977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing regulations for research involving adults who lack decision-making capacity.
Fleischman AR
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1999; 110():131-43; discussion 143-5. PubMed ID: 10344013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
Weijer C
IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Review panel cancels meeting as gene therapy proposals fall.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6567):668. PubMed ID: 11644770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
