These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10316736)

  • 21. Institutional animal care and use committees.
    Britt DP
    ATLA Abstr; 1986 Mar; 13(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 11649839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
    Katz J
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Duke's hazards. Did medical experiments put patients needlessly at risk?
    Kaplan S; Brownlee S
    US News World Rep; 1999 May; 126(20):66-8, 70. PubMed ID: 10387890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene dream fades away.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2005):14-5. PubMed ID: 11656474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials.
    Gordon VM; Sugarman J; Kass N
    IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implementing the basic elements of collaborative practice.
    DeRose J
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Mar; 10(3):19-20, 22-5. PubMed ID: 10250210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human experimentation. AIDS trials questioned.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6316):263. PubMed ID: 2008204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities.
    Knepper JD
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules.
    Casey SB; Adams NA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Better structure can improve peer review.
    Fainter J
    QA Rev; 1989 Sep; 1(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 10296757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consent to research with impaired human subjects: a trial policy for the intramural programs of the National Institutes of Health.
    Fletcher JC; Dommel FW; Cowell DD
    IRB; 1985; 7(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Protecting "human guinea pigs".
    Thompson RC
    FDA Consum; 1986 Dec-1987 Jan; 20(10):12-5. PubMed ID: 10311766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The pharmacy medication error peer-review committee.
    Myles LJ; Naeger LL
    Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 22(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10280294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Agencies look to improve informed consent.
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):567. PubMed ID: 11644820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.