These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10316737)
1. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. George R Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. Rosensaft J Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation. Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities. Knepper JD J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and reproductive medicine: guidelines for compliance. Cackowski A J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10160175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards and bioethics committees: their role in ensuring ethical home care research. Cary AH Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):113-8. PubMed ID: 10285378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A lesson from Melos. Owen JA Hosp Formul; 1979 Feb; 14(2):127. PubMed ID: 10240142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tales of informed consent: four years on an institutional review board. Bartolo Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):193-245. PubMed ID: 10124879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death at Johns Hopkins. Kennedy D Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5532):1013. PubMed ID: 11498548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation. Himmelsbach CK Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution, structure and function of the institutional review board. Prentice ED; Zetterman RK Nebr Med J; 1983 Sep; 68(9):293-5. PubMed ID: 6633743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What's new with institutional review boards? Stone PW Appl Nurs Res; 2001 Aug; 14(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 11481596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An even safer safety net. Prentice E Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Institutional Review Board: a case study of no-risk decisions in health-related research. Gortner SR; Heath E; Sanders P Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 6906010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]