191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10316738)
1. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
Rosensaft J
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
George R
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What's new with institutional review boards?
Stone PW
Appl Nurs Res; 2001 Aug; 14(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 11481596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The decline of NIH's peer-review system?
Hecht F
N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov; 301(19):1068. PubMed ID: 492248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. College expresses concern on fetal research legislative proposals.
J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 4546436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tales of informed consent: four years on an institutional review board.
Bartolo
Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):193-245. PubMed ID: 10124879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparations for the National Cancer Act of 1971.
Murphy GP
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(12):2599-600. PubMed ID: 8952573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Review panel cancels meeting as gene therapy proposals fall.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6567):668. PubMed ID: 11644770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional animal care and use committees.
Britt DP
ATLA Abstr; 1986 Mar; 13(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 11649839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Half-full or half-empty? Evaluating IRB performance.
Mishkin B; Ariand N
Prof Ethics Rep; 1998; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11657925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution, structure and function of the institutional review board.
Prentice ED; Zetterman RK
Nebr Med J; 1983 Sep; 68(9):293-5. PubMed ID: 6633743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human experimentation. AIDS trials questioned.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6316):263. PubMed ID: 2008204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities.
Knepper JD
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
