These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317012)

  • 1. The case of Earle Spring: terminating treatment on the senile.
    Glantz LH
    Medicoleg News; 1980 Sep; 8(4):14, 27. PubMed ID: 10317012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In the matter of Earle Spring: some thoughts on one court's approach to senility.
    Kart CS
    Gerontologist; 1981 Aug; 21(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 7262572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Termination of life support systems in the elderly: Legal issues: the cases of Brother Fox and Earle Spring.
    Annas GJ
    J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 7343583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
    Sappington GM
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
    Baron CH
    J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Annas GJ
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
    Tecklenburg N
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980).
    Lubinsky MS
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Death, dying, and the courts: the travesty and tragedy of the Earle Spring case.
    Paris JJ
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 11650518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families.
    Glantz LH
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In re Conroy.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
    Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The withdrawal of medical treatment from patients: fundamental legal issues.
    Robertson D
    Aust Law J; 1996 Sep; 70(9):723-46. PubMed ID: 11660615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
    Kadish SH
    Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debate on euthanasia encouraged in Japan.
    Gutierrez E
    Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9049):409. PubMed ID: 11654600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mrs. Wanglie and "doctor knows best" and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases.
    Rouse F
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1342345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
    Murphy JG
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for child without parental consent. R. v. Portsmouth Hospitals N.H.S. Trust ex parte Glass.
    Fennell P
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 11787503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of life in the courts: Earle Spring in fantasyland.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Aug; 10(4):9-10. PubMed ID: 6101253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.