These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317012)
21. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vox clamantis in deserto: do you really mean what you say in Spring? Dunn LJ; Ator NE Medicoleg News; 1981 Feb; 9(1):14-6, 27. PubMed ID: 10317079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In re Quinlan: one step further. Ek GK Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny. Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Philosophical, ethical, and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. III. Discussion. Schaffner KF; Snyder JV; Abramson NS; Bar-Joseph G; D'Alecy LG; Edgren E; Lave JR; Meisel A; Miller BL; Mullie A Crit Care Med; 1988 Oct; 16(10):1069-76. PubMed ID: 3168496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In the matter of Claire Conroy. Connery JR Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids. Paris JJ; Reardon FE JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. DNR: an objectionable form of euthanasia. Levin DL; Levin NR Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(3):567-79. PubMed ID: 11649373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society? Rothenberg KH St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Terminating treatment for newborns: a theological perspective. Paris JJ Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):120-4, 144. PubMed ID: 6920536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The right to die. Kirven G Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]