These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"? Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. When parents refuse treatment for children. Gerber PC Physicians Manage; 1984 Sep; 24(9):114-6, 121, 124 passim. PubMed ID: 10317507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Doctors, hospitals challenge ruling on care of newborns. Assoc Manage; 1983 Sep; 35(9):15-6. PubMed ID: 10317367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Who is responsible for Baby Doe? Rome LP Ohio State Med J; 1984 Jan; 80(1):21-3, 25, 27. PubMed ID: 6229705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals? Weissburg C; Guth J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. HHS reissues Baby Doe regulation. Fox JE US Med; 1984 Feb; 20(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 10317434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Government abandons efforts to obtain records of "Baby Jane Doe"; in AHA v. Heckler, government motion filed in Second Circuit denied. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Aug; 7(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond. Phillips CA Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Don't withhold infant care, hospitals told. Am Med News; 1982 May; 25(20):3, 34. PubMed ID: 10255838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. 'Baby Doe' rule's successes told. Krieger L Am Med News; 1983 Aug; 26(30):1, 6. PubMed ID: 10264153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: how do we decide? Bowden VR Child Health Care; 1988; 17(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 10318093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous. Klug J Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 15-31; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Court of Appeals denies government petition for rehearing in case of handicapped infant. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 10266523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]