These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317458)
1. Virginia Supreme Court requires CON for a hospital open heart surgery unit reactivated after one year. Kinney ED Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10317458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Board refuses CON for cardiac surgery facility. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1978 Apr; 59(4):82, 84, 87. PubMed ID: 631828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CON unnecessary when hospital resumes service. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1981 Jan; 62(1):68. PubMed ID: 10317041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New Hampshire court permits outpatient services without CON. Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Sep; 5(11):48. PubMed ID: 10288838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Arkansas court halts construction, upholds state health plan in CON proceeding. Nestrud CR Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 10264696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court upholds THFC procedure. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Apr; 39(11):46-8. PubMed ID: 10266316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court enjoins completion of a hospital parking lot because affiliated holding company failed to obtain a CON. Kinney ED Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(22):18-9. PubMed ID: 10263295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Court won't rule on CON inequity. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1979 Oct; 9(10):90, 94. PubMed ID: 481414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital awarded CON for shelled space. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1979 Apr; 60(4):84. PubMed ID: 422174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AHA's CON regulation testimony focuses on effective date, access, and procedures. Siegel T Health Law Vigil; 1980 May; 3(9):3-4. PubMed ID: 10247624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MDPH and comparative CON reviews. Shannon MA Mich Hosp; 1984 Jun; 20(6):7-10. PubMed ID: 10266671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital appealed CON denial. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1978 Nov; 59(11):82. PubMed ID: 700686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court to consider Medicare reimbursement for cost of compliance with CON condition. Green MJ Health Law Vigil; 1980 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 10297911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CON reform: its impact on construction. Chudler KM Mich Hosp; 1988 May; 24(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 10287256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public opinion influences decision on CON process. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):95, 97. PubMed ID: 10255979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Oklahoma court approves City of Faith certification: cite "national constituency". Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 10250670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court quashes Humana building bid. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1984 Mar; 14(4):178. PubMed ID: 10265446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. CON: an added burden for smaller hospitals. Meeker RA Mich Hosp; 1987 Sep; 23(9):27-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10283547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]