These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317522)
1. In the matter of Baby Jane Doe: does Reagan really agree with us? Biklen DP; Ferguson PM Soc Policy; 1984; 15(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10317522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe. Gerry MH; Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"? Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Baby Doe' regulation still agitates with revision 3. Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 10317427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Government petitions U.S. Supreme Court on Baby Doe regulations. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(7):9. PubMed ID: 10325192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Government abandons efforts to obtain records of "Baby Jane Doe"; in AHA v. Heckler, government motion filed in Second Circuit denied. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Aug; 7(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Remembering the politics of Baby Doe. Prout DM Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986; 6(7):15, 22. PubMed ID: 10317770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Baby Doe": oral arguments before the Supreme Court. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jan; 9(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 10317677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who is responsible for Baby Doe? Andrusko D; Fost N; Horowitz RM; Johnson M; Marchand P; Slack IJ Public Welf; 1984; 42(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 10317487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Government intercedes in "Baby Jane Doe". Holden C Science; 1983 Nov; 222(4626):908. PubMed ID: 6227081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 'Baby Doe' call and its consequences. Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):67-73. PubMed ID: 6233214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals? Weissburg C; Guth J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe? Jolly CM West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Families caring for disabled need long-term support. Koop CE Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 10317756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Handicapped children: Baby Doe and Uncle Sam. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1983 Sep; 309(11):659-61. PubMed ID: 6225018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]