These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317522)

  • 21. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perspectives. Baby Doe reconsidered.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jan; 38(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The "Baby Doe" regulations: an overview.
    DeCesare B
    Health Matrix; 1984; 2(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 10325191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Should imperfect infants survive? The 'Baby Doe' regs.
    Baer S
    Natl Rev; 1983 Sep; 35(17):1069, 1092-3. PubMed ID: 16440474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
    National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
    Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Baby Jane Doe.
    America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Court of Appeals denies government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 10265234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Congress faces fragile compromise on 'Baby Doe'.
    Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(16):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10268025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AHA files brief in U.S. Supreme Court in "Baby Doe" case.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Nov; 8(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives. The continuing saga of Baby Doe.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 38(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court of Appeals reviews decision denying government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe; AHA files brief in support of hospital.
    Tomaselli LA; Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Dec; 6(26):1-2. PubMed ID: 10264307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Press A; Cooper N; Hager M; Howard L
    Newsweek; 1983 Nov; 102(22):45-6. PubMed ID: 10263113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision.
    Punch L; Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Joint policy statement. Principles of treatment of disabled infants.
    Pediatrics; 1984 Apr; 73(4):559-60. PubMed ID: 6231521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
    Cantrell DF
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Groups seek to force new 'Baby Doe' laws.
    Med World News; 1984 Jun; 25(12):14. PubMed ID: 11645514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HHS 'Baby Doe' proposals draws fire.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Jan; 15(2):44. PubMed ID: 10269500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.