261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317617)
1. Stat guidelines for laboratories.
Sazama K; Haugh MG
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1985 Mar; 17(3):55-7. PubMed ID: 10317617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness in utilization of the laboratory.
Pathologist; 1982 Sep; 36(9):481-3. PubMed ID: 10317295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NCCLS: developing voluntary consensus standards for the clinical laboratory.
Keitges PW
Pathologist; 1979 Feb; 33(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 10240257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CAP accreditation is laboratory improvement.
Manhoff L; Duckworth JK
Pathologist; 1984 Jan; 38(1):42-3, 47. PubMed ID: 10264835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical laboratory standards of practice: the medical heritage.
Elevitch FR
Pathologist; 1979 Feb; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 10240255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pilot survey process to be implemented.
Affeldt JE
Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):47. PubMed ID: 700648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of laboratory operations.
Jordan TD
Med Leg Bull; 1978; 27(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 723776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CDC continues clinical hospital lab evaluations.
Hospitals; 1979 Mar; 53(5):22. PubMed ID: 215504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice: a doctor-owned insurer's experience in pathology.
Sabella JD
Pathologist; 1986 Apr; 40(4):20-3. PubMed ID: 10276467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CAP to FDA: Class II unnecessary for most of 175 devices.
Weller A
Pathologist; 1982 Nov; 36(11):597-9. PubMed ID: 10257232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Policy set for lab survey.
Perspect Accredit; 1978; (5):5. PubMed ID: 10289119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Media quality control: an unnecessary evil.
Harris PC; Sealey LB; Pitman B
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Feb; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 10265401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consensus standards: the pathologist's perspective.
Dorsey DB
Pathologist; 1979 May; 33(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 10242306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CAP bid for deemed status back on hold.
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Mar; 18(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10316116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Problem solving and decision making with proficiency data.
Snyder JR; Glenn DW
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Feb; 18(2):46-9. PubMed ID: 10275947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control: what are our goals? How much is necessary?
Arkin CF
Pathologist; 1985 Aug; 39(8):19-25. PubMed ID: 10272520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A proposal for a department of pathology improvement program.
Beautyman W; Rawnsley HM
Pathologist; 1981 Feb; 35(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 10249826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Standards Laboratory and clinical standard solutions.
Bratush JR; Galen RS
Pathologist; 1983 Jun; 37(6):384-6. PubMed ID: 10263490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular pathology, Part 2. QA initiatives for the DNA lab.
Farkas DH
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Jun; 27(6):44-9. PubMed ID: 10172326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality control in the new environment. Part VIII: Future directions in laboratory QC.
Belsey R; Baer DM
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 Apr; 19(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 10281871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
