These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317644)
41. [Compatibility of different quality control systems]. Invernizzi E Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2002; 38(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 12122894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Validity of diagnostic laboratory tests. 2. Interpretation of diagnostic laboratory results]. Adam N; Becker D; Dummler W; Hölzel W; Irrgang B; Neymeyer HG; Richter G; Schäfer C Z Med Lab Diagn; 1986; 27(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 3776312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A program for assessing statistical QC procedures. Westgard JO MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Feb; 26(2):55, 58-60. PubMed ID: 10171792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Internal quality control : false-rejections and preliminary period]. Marquis P Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2001; 59(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 11282527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A qualitative retrospective analysis of positive control data in developmental neurotoxicity studies. Crofton KM; Makris SL; Sette WF; Mendez E; Raffaele KC Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 15113596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S. Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. HAIRVEQ: an external quality control scheme for drugs of abuse analysis in hair. Pichini S; Ventura M; Pujadas M; Ventura R; Pellegrini M; Zuccaro P; Pacifici R; de la Torre R Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Oct; 145(2-3):109-15. PubMed ID: 15451081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand's disorder: quality and diagnostic improvements driven by peer review in a multilaboratory test process. Favaloro EJ; Bonar R; Kershaw G; Sioufi J; Hertzberg M; Street A; Lloyd J; Marsden K; Haemophilia; 2004 May; 10(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 15086320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A simple statistical approach for assessing inter-laboratory comparison tests for classical swine fever diagnosis. Depner KR; Ziller M; Staubach C J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2006 Dec; 53(10):473-6. PubMed ID: 17123425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How reliable are results from the semen analysis? Keel BA Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 15236987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Robust and traditional statistical methods in the establishment of immunoglobulin E target values in external quality assessment program. Zhou Q; Shen Z; Li S; Li X; Wang W; Wang Z Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Jan; 387(1-2):66-70. PubMed ID: 17915202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Sciacovelli L; Plebani M Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 19328194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. External quality assurance in Malaysia. Nawawi H; Lim HH; Zakiah I Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():39-45. PubMed ID: 10926257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [An approach to evaluation methods for laboratory work]. Usui T Rinsho Byori; 1993 Apr; 41(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 8350494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Mistakes encountered during external quality assessment schemes (EQAS): illustrated and categorized examples. Maitrejean M; Morandi PA; Deom A Clin Lab; 2007; 53(7-8):483-4. PubMed ID: 17821955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]