These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317677)

  • 1. "Baby Doe": oral arguments before the Supreme Court.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jan; 9(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 10317677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Government petitions U.S. Supreme Court on Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(7):9. PubMed ID: 10325192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHA files brief in U.S. Supreme Court in "Baby Doe" case.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Nov; 8(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remembering the politics of Baby Doe.
    Prout DM
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986; 6(7):15, 22. PubMed ID: 10317770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In the matter of Baby Jane Doe: does Reagan really agree with us?
    Biklen DP; Ferguson PM
    Soc Policy; 1984; 15(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10317522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 'Baby Doe' call and its consequences.
    Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):67-73. PubMed ID: 6233214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handicapped children: Baby Doe and Uncle Sam.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Sep; 309(11):659-61. PubMed ID: 6225018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Doe: AHA prevails in Supreme Court.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10276708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives. Baby Doe reconsidered.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jan; 38(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "Baby Doe" regulations: an overview.
    DeCesare B
    Health Matrix; 1984; 2(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 10325191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reagan Administration revises "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Iglehart JK
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Feb; 65(2):17, 20. PubMed ID: 10317422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 1983 Supreme Court abortion decisions: impact on hospitals, a conflict with Baby Doe?
    Carlson RA
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):2-7. PubMed ID: 10263291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives. The continuing saga of Baby Doe.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 38(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Baby Doe' regulation still agitates with revision 3.
    Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 10317427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision.
    Punch L; Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Government abandons efforts to obtain records of "Baby Jane Doe"; in AHA v. Heckler, government motion filed in Second Circuit denied.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Aug; 7(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals?
    Weissburg C; Guth J
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.