These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Technology, financing and rationing: where to from here in the DRG era? Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):12-3, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10310588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. How to help your hospital survive. Goldsmith JC Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1985; 29(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 10311184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland. Atkinson G; Murray R J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. New HIMA chief favors moratorium on DRG changes to give system a chance to work. Samuel FE Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10310589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Major joint surgeries: a mixed bag under prospective payment. Nathanson M Mod Healthc; 1984 Sep; 14(12):38, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10310783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The impact of autopsy data on DRG reimbursement. Guariglia P; Abrahams C Hum Pathol; 1985 Dec; 16(12):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3934064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. An empirical analysis of a DRG-based fixed payment system: the Georgia Alternative Reimbursement System. Skantz TR; Love DB J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 11(4):396-413. PubMed ID: 10313328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Lingering side effects. DRG changes called positive but other woes remain. Barr P Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(33):17. PubMed ID: 16124723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Payment for using new technologies. Why it's hard to find the essential information that you need. Health Technol; 1988; 2(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 10312482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Cost of diagnostic and therapeutic hemodynamic procedures: comparison with DRG reimbursement]. Varani E; Balducelli M; Vecchi G; Maresta A Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Jun; 2(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 11460839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. How hospitals respond to changes in Medicare reimbursements. Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health; 2003; (5):2-3. PubMed ID: 15141687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. ProPAC and the surgeon: DRG recalibration. Munoz E Bull Am Coll Surg; 1988 Aug; 73(8):14-6. PubMed ID: 10312597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. New, innovative technologies help hospitals fight DRG squeeze. Carter K Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):74, 76. PubMed ID: 10275219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [The quality of patient care under the German DRG system using as example the inguinal hernia repair]. Rudroff C; Schweins M; Heiss MM Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Feb; 133(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18278703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Payment Error Prevention Program (PEPP): reducing Medicare payment errors in prospective payment system hospitals. Bitonte DA; Curry P; Butler P; Nowak MJ; Jean-Baptiste R; Feigenbaum RA Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 May; 21(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 11378983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]