These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317816)
1. Cost-effective utilization of microbiology data. Cunha BA; Gurevich I; Tafuro P Hosp Physician; 1986 Nov; 22(11):19-21. PubMed ID: 10317816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan hospital laboratory on-site review project. DesHarnais S; Kibe NM; Barbus S Inquiry; 1983; 20(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 6229483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriate but not cost effective ceftazidime use in a university hospital. Colburn PA; Carver PA; Montgomery PA; Alaniz C; Chaffee BW; Amesbury BK Hosp Pharm; 1989 Nov; 24(11):911-6, 928. PubMed ID: 10313376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory utilization on a university surgical service. Liptzin BA; Williams JS Surgery; 1972 Feb; 71(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 5057837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness in utilization of the laboratory. Pathologist; 1982 Sep; 36(9):481-3. PubMed ID: 10317295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effective use of laboratory tests: a joint responsibility of clinicians and laboratorians. Wong ET Clin Lab Med; 1985 Dec; 5(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 3936668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory]. Suzuki K; Higuchi T Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of the microbiology laboratory in guiding formulary decisions. Stratton CW Hosp Formul; 1988 Aug; 23(8):654-7. PubMed ID: 10312591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two ophthalmology departments financed by compulsory health insurance: what is it that makes a difference in costs and clinical effectiveness? Nasić M; Oresković S Croat Med J; 2002 Aug; 43(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 12187521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups. Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A hospitalwide task force to reduce lab utilization. Yound DS; Tidwell GJ MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Oct; 21(10):31-4, 36, 40. PubMed ID: 10318332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How to successfully influence laboratory test utilization. Plapp FV; Essmyer CE; Byrd AB; Zucker ML Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2000; 14(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 11210209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost-effective method for reducing the volume of laboratory tests in a university-associated teaching hospital. Attali M; Barel Y; Somin M; Beilinson N; Shankman M; Ackerman A; Malnick SD Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 Sep; 73(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 17008940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cooperative strategy for curbing test abuse. Connelly D MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Jul; 16(7):40-6. PubMed ID: 10317465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships among patient age, diagnosis, hospital type, and clinical laboratory utilization. Taylor JB Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 15747782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A microcomputer program for prospective utilization review of diagnostic tests. Abendroth TW; Bongiovanni MB; Krieg AF Softw Healthc; 1986; 4(3):53-4, 57-8. PubMed ID: 10317848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost of nurse-sensitive adverse events. Pappas SH J Nurs Adm; 2008 May; 38(5):230-6. PubMed ID: 18469616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]