These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10317888)
21. Drug screening and your rights. Duffy DP RN; 1988 Jun; 51(6):65-71. PubMed ID: 3375756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Drug testing of employees: proceed with caution. Hofmann PB; Peters E Hospitals; 1987 Jun; 61(11):80. PubMed ID: 3570227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Urine screening: what does it mean? McMillan DE NIDA Res Monogr; 1989; 95():206-10. PubMed ID: 2640965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. OHN discusses drug testing program. Gordon M Occup Health Saf; 1986 Oct; 55(10):85-6. PubMed ID: 3785815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Substance abuse testing programs: minimizing the risks. Albert RM Health Care Law Newsl; 1986 Dec; 1(6):11-5. PubMed ID: 10317915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Urine testing for drugs of abuse. NIDA Res Monogr; 1986; 73():1-114. PubMed ID: 3127715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing health care workers for drugs: developing and implementing a program. Kizziar JH; Nichols RS Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1991; 11(3):18-23. PubMed ID: 10170771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Recent developments in workers' compensation and employers' liability law. Macauley AJ Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2006; 41(2):783-98. PubMed ID: 16685813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Genetic screening in the workplace. Pendola MH J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Sep; 22(9):272-81. PubMed ID: 10318357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The testing of urine specimens for drugs of abuse: background information. Cohen MR Hosp Pharm; 1987 Apr; 22(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 10317883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A new year look at constitutional rights of public employees. Slesnick D Fla Nurse; 1988 Jan; 36(1):18. PubMed ID: 3338598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The public says "yes" to mandatory drug testing. Steiber S Hospitals; 1986 Sep; 60(17):100. PubMed ID: 3744311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening workers for drugs: a legal and ethical framework. Rothstein MA Employee Relat Law J; 1985-1986 Winter; 11(3):422-37. PubMed ID: 10317703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Commission's drug testing proposal 'last resort' in controlling abuse. Polakoff PL Occup Health Saf; 1986 Oct; 55(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 3785806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A look at equal employment opportunity. Rodriguez AM Labor Law J; 1982 May; 33(5):259-64. PubMed ID: 10255644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. AIDS prevention and civil liberties: the false security of mandatory testing. Hunter ND AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 11650042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Mandatory reassignment under the ADA: the circuit split and need for a socio-political understanding of disability. Dorsey NA Cornell Law Rev; 2009 Jan; 94(2):443-78. PubMed ID: 19288614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Technologic cornucopias, the Bill of Rights, and slippery slopes. Louria DB N J Med; 1993 Jan; 90(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 8419856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The constitutional implications of mandatory testing for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome--AIDS. Levy SJ Emory Law J; 1988; 37(1):217-48. PubMed ID: 11652522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]