221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10318126)
1. DRG 468: an analysis of data quality.
Holderman NF
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):30-3. PubMed ID: 10318126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A focused approach to coding quality control.
Green DK
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Concurrent coding provides more accurate data for outcomes and performance reports.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):25-7, 17. PubMed ID: 10345330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control of diagnosis and procedure coding.
Thompson BJ; Loup RJ
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):46-55. PubMed ID: 10265591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Coding guidelines--a step toward data quality assurance.
Moore BL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):16-7. PubMed ID: 10310698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate medical records to have key impact on hospitals in a DRG case mix system.
MacDonald E
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):55-8, 61-4. PubMed ID: 10309845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the medical record credential on data quality.
Green E; Benjamin C
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):29-38. PubMed ID: 10280223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SuperPRO DRG validation process.
Barnes CA
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 10311650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic validation of medical data.
Brown B; Harbort B
Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 10275708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Considering qualitative standards for health care data.
Sheehy KH
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):31-7. PubMed ID: 10309863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical records: a new challenge under prospective DRG reimbursement.
Ryckman D; Sourapas JK
Top Health Care Financ; 1985; 11(3):47-58. PubMed ID: 3920786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Essentials of accurate coding. American Medical Record Association.
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):9-16. PubMed ID: 10274546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of PAS abstracting methods.
Goodell S
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):17-26. PubMed ID: 10309948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Test your ICD-9-CM coding.
Jew M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 10309864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Executive message ... accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective payment system (PPS).
Amatayakul M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Apr; 62(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10113573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated ICD-9-CM coding: an inevitable trend to expert systems.
Demuth AI
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Oct; 2(10):62-6. PubMed ID: 10273781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing concurrent review coding problems.
Bulatow NL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):36-8. PubMed ID: 10287422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usage of "principal" and "primary" designations in disease and operations indexes.
Campbell CA; Johnston CA
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Dec; 57(12):42-6. PubMed ID: 10279295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The medical record department's impact on hospital revenue.
Fox LA
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10312383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of hospital activity analysis operation codes.
Whates PD; Birzgalis AR; Irving M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Jun; 284(6332):1857-8. PubMed ID: 6805731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
