These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10318282)
1. Determining i.v. infusion rates for critical care drugs using a microcomputer. Oszko MA Hosp Pharm; 1989 Jun; 24(6):465-6, 483. PubMed ID: 10318282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric emergency information sheet using a microcomputer. Muoghalu BU; Kaiser R; Keller M; Benson S; Grant J; McKeegan G Hosp Pharm; 1992 Jan; 27(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10116117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a microcomputer in a pediatric hospital. Enderlin GM; Summerfield MR; Burney MT Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Mar; 44(3):565-8. PubMed ID: 3565415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis. Apkon M; Leonard J; Probst L; DeLizio L; Vitale R Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Aug; 13(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15289629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted TPN calculations: time savings and improved accuracy associated with use of a minicomputer. Raehtz KG; Walker PC Hosp Pharm; 1988 Sep; 23(9):800-4. PubMed ID: 10312684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer driven i.v. injection systems. State of the art, future developments. Cantraine F Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1988; 39(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 3232499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision support for medication use in an inpatient physician order entry application and a pharmacy application. Kuperman GJ; Cooley T; Tremblay J; Teich JM; Churchill W Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():467-71. PubMed ID: 10384500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study--manual versus computerized automated drug delivery systems. Senefeld P; Patterson A J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 1748912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: an observational study. Fahimi F; Ariapanah P; Faizi M; Shafaghi B; Namdar R; Ardakani MT Aust Crit Care; 2008 May; 21(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 18387813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. Husch M; Sullivan C; Rooney D; Barnard C; Fotis M; Clarke J; Noskin G Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Apr; 14(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 15805451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ad hoc versus standardized admixtures for continuous infusion drugs in neonatal intensive care: cognitive task analysis of safety at the bedside. Brannon TS AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():862. PubMed ID: 17238482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of drug interaction microcomputer software: Medicom Micro Plus. Poirier TI; Giudici RA Hosp Pharm; 1989 Apr; 24(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 10293283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medication reconciliation using natural language processing and controlled terminologies. Cimino JJ; Bright TJ; Li J Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):679-83. PubMed ID: 17911803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [FARMAC: a program designed for monitoring the prescription of antimicrobials in hospitals]. Medina-Cuevas F; Navarrete-Navarro S; Avila-Figueroa C; Santos-Preciado JI Gac Med Mex; 2000; 136(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 10815321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children. Walsh KE; Landrigan CP; Adams WG; Vinci RJ; Chessare JB; Cooper MR; Hebert PM; Schainker EG; McLaughlin TJ; Bauchner H Pediatrics; 2008 Mar; 121(3):e421-7. PubMed ID: 18310162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]