These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10318408)

  • 1. Report of the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, May 27-28, Washington, DC.
    Med Rec News; 1975 Aug; 46(4):80-4. PubMed ID: 10318408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Report of the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, July 21-22, 1975, Washington, DC.
    Med Rec News; 1975 Oct; 46(5):72-4. PubMed ID: 10318410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A report on the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, September 22-23, 1975, Washington, DC.
    Med Rec News; 1975 Dec; 46(6):77-9. PubMed ID: 10318411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A report on the national professional standards review council meeting May 3-4, 1976; Washington, DC.
    Med Rec News; 1976 Jun; 47(3):67-76. PubMed ID: 1035783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New federal regulations, professional standards review organization, JCAH and criteria development.
    Tucker JH; Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1975 Feb; 46(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10318407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PROs explore changes in current review process.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Apr; 76(4):24-6, 29. PubMed ID: 10109750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department.
    McGarvey MR
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accreditation for UR firms.
    QRC Advis; 1991 Apr; 7(6):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 10109919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PSRO: an evaluation of the Professional Standards Review Organization.
    J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 10308911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PSRO performance: the 1977 and 1978 evaluations of Professional Standards Review Organizations.
    Goldstein RL; Stanton B; Burwell L
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Oct; 5(10):3-7. PubMed ID: 121385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UCDS (Uniform Clinical Data Set): a closer look at what's just around the corner at HCFA.
    QRC Advis; 1991 Jan; 7(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 10108519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing utilization review program results.
    Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testimony before the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine. Committee on utilization management by third parties.
    Appel FA
    J Qual Assur; 1988; 10(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10291429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review.
    Luecke RW
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new economics of PSRO review: an uncertain future.
    Luecke RW; Freeman JK
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Apr; 35(4):56-8, 60, 62. PubMed ID: 10273247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRO-hospital contracts: the last chance to ease burden of reviews.
    O'Hare PK; Collier G
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):54-8. PubMed ID: 10299720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs.
    Thompson RE
    Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is your physician advisor strict enough? Physician advisor denials, workload analyzed.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Dec; 3(12):158-60. PubMed ID: 10273113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: their part in the struggle to assure appropriate health care.
    Davis FA
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 6810978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.