BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10318804)

  • 41. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction.
    Weissman JS; Rye HS; Fenton WA; Beechem JM; Horwich AL
    Cell; 1996 Feb; 84(3):481-90. PubMed ID: 8608602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation.
    Landry SJ; Gierasch LM
    Biochemistry; 1991 Jul; 30(30):7359-62. PubMed ID: 1677268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The crystal structure of a sulfurtransferase from Azotobacter vinelandii highlights the evolutionary relationship between the rhodanese and phosphatase enzyme families.
    Bordo D; Deriu D; Colnaghi R; Carpen A; Pagani S; Bolognesi M
    J Mol Biol; 2000 May; 298(4):691-704. PubMed ID: 10788330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The lower hydrolysis of ATP by the stress protein GroEL is a major factor responsible for the diminished chaperonin activity at low temperature.
    Mendoza JA; Dulin P; Warren T
    Cryobiology; 2000 Dec; 41(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 11222029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Purification and characterization of Chromatium vinosum GroEL and GroES proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells lacking the endogenous groESL operon.
    Dionisi HM; Viale AM
    Protein Expr Purif; 1998 Nov; 14(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 9790891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Single molecular observation of the interaction of GroEL with substrate proteins.
    Yamasaki R; Hoshino M; Wazawa T; Ishii Y; Yanagida T; Kawata Y; Higurashi T; Sakai K; Nagai J; Goto Y
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Oct; 292(5):965-72. PubMed ID: 10512696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Chaperone-dependent folding and activation of ribosome-bound nascent rhodanese. Analysis by fluorescence.
    Kudlicki W; Odom OW; Kramer G; Hardesty B
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Dec; 244(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 7966342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Isolation and characterization of rhodanese intermediates during thermal inactivation and their implications for the mechanism of protein aggregation.
    Bhattacharyya AM; Horowitz PM
    Biochemistry; 2002 Jan; 41(1):422-9. PubMed ID: 11772042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Active-site sulfhydryl chemistry plays a major role in the misfolding of urea-denatured rhodanese.
    Panda M; Horowitz PM
    J Protein Chem; 2000 Jul; 19(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 11131146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. NMR analysis of the binding of a rhodanese peptide to a minichaperone in solution.
    Kobayashi N; Freund SM; Chatellier J; Zahn R; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Sep; 292(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 10493867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interaction of oxidized chaperonin GroEL with an unfolded protein at low temperatures.
    Melkani GC; Sielaff R; Zardeneta G; Mendoza JA
    Biosci Rep; 2012 Jun; 32(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22273181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Physical characterization of a reactivatable liposome-bound rhodanese folding intermediate.
    Zardeneta G; Horowitz PM
    Biochemistry; 1993 Dec; 32(50):13941-8. PubMed ID: 8268170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. GroEL and GroES increase the specific enzymatic activity of newly-synthesized rhodanese if present during in vitro transcription/translation.
    Tsalkova T; Zardeneta G; Kudlicki W; Kramer G; Horowitz PM; Hardesty B
    Biochemistry; 1993 Apr; 32(13):3377-80. PubMed ID: 8096394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discrimination of ATP, ADP, and AMPPNP by chaperonin GroEL: hexokinase treatment revealed the exclusive role of ATP.
    Motojima F; Yoshida M
    J Biol Chem; 2003 Jul; 278(29):26648-54. PubMed ID: 12736270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Micelle-assisted protein folding. Denatured rhodanese binding to cardiolipin-containing lauryl maltoside micelles results in slower refolding kinetics but greater enzyme reactivation.
    Zardeneta G; Horowitz PM
    J Biol Chem; 1992 Mar; 267(9):5811-6. PubMed ID: 1556097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of interactions with the GroEL cavity on protein folding rates.
    Sirur A; Best RB
    Biophys J; 2013 Mar; 104(5):1098-106. PubMed ID: 23473493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The sulfurtransferase activity and structure of rhodanese are affected by site-directed replacement of Arg-186 or Lys-249.
    Luo GX; Horowitz PM
    J Biol Chem; 1994 Mar; 269(11):8220-5. PubMed ID: 8132546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nuclear magnetic resonance approaches for characterizing interactions between the bacterial chaperonin GroEL and unstructured proteins.
    Nishida N; Yagi-Utsumi M; Motojima F; Yoshida M; Shimada I; Kato K
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2013 Aug; 116(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 23567152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mechanisms for GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a large 86-kDa fusion polypeptide in vitro.
    Huang YS; Chuang DT
    J Biol Chem; 1999 Apr; 274(15):10405-12. PubMed ID: 10187830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Active site structural features for chemically modified forms of rhodanese.
    Gliubich F; Gazerro M; Zanotti G; Delbono S; Bombieri G; Berni R
    J Biol Chem; 1996 Aug; 271(35):21054-61. PubMed ID: 8702871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.