BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10319298)

  • 21. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice.
    Austin RM
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer -- a global and regional generalized cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ginsberg GM; Edejer TT; Lauer JA; Sepulveda C
    Vaccine; 2009 Oct; 27(43):6060-79. PubMed ID: 19647813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integrating human papillomavirus vaccination in cervical cancer control programmes.
    Franco EL; Coutlée F; Ferenczy A
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(5-6):352-61. PubMed ID: 19684447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.
    Hermens RP; Hak E; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov; 51(472):897-903. PubMed ID: 11761203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection and selection decisions in the practice of screening mammography.
    Stewart TR; Mumpower JL
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2004 Aug; 23(4):908-20. PubMed ID: 15505941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Presenting new screening guidelines.
    Ortolon K
    Tex Med; 2003 Nov; 99(11):24-9. PubMed ID: 14650715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of three stool tests for colorectal cancer screening.
    Greenwald B
    Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Oct; 14(5):292-9; quiz 300. PubMed ID: 16318108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
    Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for colorectal cancer.
    Saliangas K
    Tech Coloproctol; 2004 Nov; 8 Suppl 1():s10-3. PubMed ID: 15655587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient education regarding cancer screening guidelines.
    Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2003; 7(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 14603556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening and women's health.
    Robinson KE
    Nursing (Lond); 1988 Jan; 3(25):940-3. PubMed ID: 3399155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cancer screening and prevention guidelines.
    Cole DD
    Lippincotts Prim Care Pract; 2000; 4(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 11261121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians.
    Kupets R; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Nov; 83(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 11606071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic considerations in patients with back pain.
    Andersson GB
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 May; 9(2):309-22. PubMed ID: 9894120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A framework provided an outline toward the proper evaluation of potential screening strategies.
    Adriaensen WJ; Matheï C; Buntinx FJ; Arbyn M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 23395357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.