These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10319828)

  • 1. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 10319828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of soft tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Vassalli IM; Thüer UW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1610-6. PubMed ID: 18634948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5.
    Chunmaneechote P; Friede H
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim YK; Chu EH; Lee DY; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20578861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ohba S; Kohara H; Koga T; Kawasaki T; Miura KI; Yoshida N; Asahina I
    Odontology; 2017 Jul; 105(3):375-381. PubMed ID: 27796598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class
    Shi Y; Shang H; Tian L; Bai S; Liu W; Liu Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):612-616. PubMed ID: 29806352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.
    Park JY; Kim MJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 23395297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients.
    Chew MT
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):959-63. PubMed ID: 16448238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Hillerup S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 55(10):1071-9; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 9331229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A more accurate method of predicting soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery.
    Suh HY; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Donatelli RE; Wheeler TT; Kim SH; Eo SH; Seo BM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):e553-62. PubMed ID: 22990101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
    Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Naoumova J; Söderfeldt B; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18524760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of setback Le Fort I osteotomy on midfacial soft-tissue changes as evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography superimposition for cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lee JY; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Park SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 23294855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Kajikawa Y
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.