These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10319931)

  • 1. Bone-graft substitutes.
    Van Heest A; Swiontkowski M
    Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353 Suppl 1():SI28-9. PubMed ID: 10319931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Bone transplantation and bone replacement materials].
    Patka P; Haarman HJ; Bakker FC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(16):893-6. PubMed ID: 9623184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Natural coral used as a substitute for bone graft. Its role in the economics of blood in spinal surgery].
    Patat JL; Pouliquen JC; Guillemin G
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1992; 58 Suppl 1():115-21. PubMed ID: 1360739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bioactive atelocollagen/hydroxyapatite composite as bone filler histological study on rats.
    Galbavý S; Bakos D; Vanis M; Horecký J; Lezovic J
    Polim Med; 1997; 27(1-2):39-45. PubMed ID: 9339472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative in vitro study of colonization behavior of osteoblasts on bone substitutes in mandibular reconstruction].
    Thornton B; Schobel G; Millesi W; Mailath G
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1994; 39():32-4. PubMed ID: 8088665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone graft substitutes.
    Bauer TW
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1105-7. PubMed ID: 17912519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone graft substitutes in spine surgery.
    Khan SN; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2000; 59(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10789032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone tissue engineering.
    Healy KE; Guldberg RE
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 18094496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone graft materials and synthetic substitutes.
    Beaman FD; Bancroft LW; Peterson JJ; Kransdorf MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2006 May; 44(3):451-61. PubMed ID: 16644361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a role of coral bone substitutes in bone repair?
    Pountos I; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2606-2613. PubMed ID: 27836254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Intervertebral biopolymer implant for arthrodesis. A study of 45 cases].
    Godard J; Jacquet G; Farhat O; Steimle R
    Chirurgie; 1991; 117(5-6):398-403; discussion 403-4. PubMed ID: 1817837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo osseointegration of nano-designed composite coatings on titanium implants.
    Facca S; Lahiri D; Fioretti F; Messadeq N; Mainard D; Benkirane-Jessel N; Agarwal A
    ACS Nano; 2011 Jun; 5(6):4790-9. PubMed ID: 21591801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term biocompatibility and osseointegration of electron beam melted, free-form-fabricated solid and porous titanium alloy: experimental studies in sheep.
    Palmquist A; Snis A; Emanuelsson L; Browne M; Thomsen P
    J Biomater Appl; 2013 May; 27(8):1003-16. PubMed ID: 22207608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioactive factors and biosynthetic materials in bone grafting.
    Hollinger JO; Seyfer AE
    Clin Plast Surg; 1994 Jul; 21(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 7924139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone grafts and bone induction substitutes.
    Habal MB; Reddi AH
    Clin Plast Surg; 1994 Oct; 21(4):525-42. PubMed ID: 7813153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes.
    Habibovic P; Kruyt MC; Juhl MV; Clyens S; Martinetti R; Dolcini L; Theilgaard N; van Blitterswijk CA
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1363-70. PubMed ID: 18404698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
    Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nacre/bone interface changes in durable nacre endosseous implants in sheep.
    Berland S; Delattre O; Borzeix S; Catonné Y; Lopez E
    Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2767-73. PubMed ID: 15585281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.