These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The relationship between electrical auditory brainstem responses and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic® SP cochlear implant users. Guenser G; Laudanski J; Phillipon B; Backus BC; Bordure P; Romanet P; Parietti-Winkler C Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24855994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users. Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stapedius reflex and EABR thresholds in experienced users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Van den Borne B; Mens LH; Snik AF; Spies TH; Van den Broek P Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 8203194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children. Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses). Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants. Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees. Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation. Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements. Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation. Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]