138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10320992)
1. [Reduction of radiation exposure in PET examinations by data acquisition in the 3D mode].
Brix G; Adam LE; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Nosske D; Doll J
Nuklearmedizin; 1999 Apr; 38(3):75-9. PubMed ID: 10320992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Investigation of the signal-to-noise ratio on a state-of-the-art PET system: measurements with the EEC whole-body phantom].
Jägel M; Adam LE; Bellemann ME; Zaers J; Trojan H; Rauschnabel K; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Aug; 37(5):171-6. PubMed ID: 9728344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET.
Lartizien C; Comtat C; Kinahan PE; Ferreira N; Bendriem B; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2002 Sep; 43(9):1268-78. PubMed ID: 12215569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
Surti S; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion.
Vines DC; Keller H; Hoisak JD; Breen SL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 18006594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation exposure to patients caused by single-photon transmission measurement in PET].
Schaefer A; Seifert H; Donsch P; Kirsch CM
Nuklearmedizin; 2000 Nov; 39(7):204-8. PubMed ID: 11127049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. F-18 FDG-PET in children: do we have enough counts?
Dobbeleir A; Ham H; Goethals I; Keppens J; D'Asseler Y; Van de Wiele C
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 20051927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of a scatter correction technique for single photon transmission measurements in PET by means of Monte Carlo simulations].
Wegmann K; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 2000; 39(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 10834193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.
Beyer T; Bockisch A; Kühl H; Martinez MJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16391192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner.
Schäfers KP; Reader AJ; Kriens M; Knoess C; Schober O; Schäfers M
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 15937311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retro-orbital injection is an effective route for radiopharmaceutical administration in mice during small-animal PET studies.
Nanni C; Pettinato C; Ambrosini V; Spinelli A; Trespidi S; Rubello D; Al-Nahhas A; Franchi R; Alavi A; Fanti S
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 17538396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A survey of PET activity in Germany during 1999.
Brix G; Nosske D; Glatting G; Minkov V; Reske SN
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12173024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving 3D PET imaging by restoration: a phantom study.
Knesaurek K; Machac J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15710537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
