138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10320992)
21. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system.
Okubo M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Shibata T; Kanamori S; Hanaoka K; Hosono M
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 18756360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner.
Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies.
Oehmigen M; Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Georgi JC; Paulus DH; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1361-7. PubMed ID: 25006216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Diagnostic evaluation of the breast using PET: optimization of data acquisition and postprocessing].
Brix G; Henze M; Doll J; Lucht R; Zaers J; Trojan H; Knopp MV; Haberkorn U
Nuklearmedizin; 2000; 39(3):62-6. PubMed ID: 10834192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of list mode data acquisition with ECAT EXACT HR and ECAT EXACT HR+ positron emission scanners.
Watabe H; Matsumoto K; Senda M; Iida H
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 16715949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging.
Knesaurek K; Machac J; Krynyckyi BR; Almeida OD
J Nucl Med; 2003 Aug; 44(8):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12902427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging system and its application for medical use].
Orihara H; Ishii K; Iwata R; Fujiwara T; Itoh M
Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Aug; 55(8):2148-55. PubMed ID: 9284437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging.
Ziegler S; Braun H; Ritt P; Hocke C; Kuwert T; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1464-71. PubMed ID: 23792278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimal dose of 18F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET camera.
Everaert H; Vanhove C; Lahoutte T; Muylle K; Caveliers V; Bossuyt A; Franken PR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1615-9. PubMed ID: 14504831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [High resolution reconstruction of PET images using the iterative OSEM algorithm].
Doll J; Henze M; Bublitz O; Werling A; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Semmler W; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 2004 Jun; 43(3):72-8. PubMed ID: 15201947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An animal PET scanner using flat-panel position-sensitive PMTs.
Okamoto T; Ote K; Sakai K; Noda A; Shimizu K; Masuda K; Ohmura T; Watanabe M
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 24078320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of 3D acquisition mode for myocardial FDG PET studies using a BGO-based scanner.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 34(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 17333179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
Brix G; Zaers J; Adam LE; Bellemann ME; Ostertag H; Trojan H; Haberkorn U; Doll J; Oberdorfer F; Lorenz WJ
J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1614-23. PubMed ID: 9379202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Evaluation of optimized injection dose and acquisition time using body mass index for three-dimensional whole-body FDG-PET].
Matsumoto K; Matsuura H; Minota E; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1564-73. PubMed ID: 15568009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Investigation of the resolution and count recovery coefficients of a whole-body PET scanner (Shimadzu SET-2400W) in 2D and 3D mode image].
Watanuki S; Fujiwara T; Ishii K; Miyake M; Itoh M; Kitamura K
Kaku Igaku; 2000 Jan; 37(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 10714066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies.
Votaw JR; White M
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 11337563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of noise equivalent count per line of response: new parameter for count statistics for PET systems].
Matsumoto K; Wada Y; Matsuura H; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Aug; 60(8):1116-22. PubMed ID: 15389169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional imaging characteristics of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner.
Karp JS; Freifelder R; Geagan MJ; Muehllehner G; Kinahan PE; Lewitt RM; Shao L
J Nucl Med; 1997 Apr; 38(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 9098216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of a short acquisition protocol for whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose.
Paul AK; Tatsumi M; Fujino K; Hashikawa K; Nishimura T
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1697-701. PubMed ID: 11702113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
