These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10321141)

  • 1. Adult orthodontic therapy: extraction versus non-extraction.
    Baumrind S
    Clin Orthod Res; 1998 Nov; 1(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10321141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The decision to extract: Part 1--Interclinician agreement.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Boyd RL; Maxwell R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 8607475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
    Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians' stated reasons for extraction.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Boyd RL; Maxwell R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 8638581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does articulating study casts make a difference to treatment planning?
    Ellis PE; Benson PE
    J Orthod; 2003 Mar; 30(1):45-9; discussion 22-3. PubMed ID: 12644607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of patient classification in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Luke LS; Atchison KA; White SC
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 9851348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of clinicians' experience and gender on extraction decision in orthodontics.
    Saghafi N; Heaton LJ; Bayirli B; Turpin DL; Khosravi R; Bollen AM
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):641-650. PubMed ID: 28686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions.
    Lee R; MacFarlane T; O'Brien K
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 10534983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetric extractions used in the treatment of patients with asymmetries.
    Rebellato J
    Semin Orthod; 1998 Sep; 4(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 9807154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapeutic decisions in the presence of decayed permanent first molars in young subjects: a descriptive inquiry.
    Sayagh M; Maniere-Ezvan A; Vernet C; Muller-Bolla M
    Int Orthod; 2012 Sep; 10(3):318-36. PubMed ID: 22921348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the decision to extract influence the development of gingival recessions? A retrospective long-term evaluation.
    Villard NM; Patcas R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):476-92. PubMed ID: 26446502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends.
    Keim RG; Gottlieb EL; Nelson AH; Vogels DS
    J Clin Orthod; 2002 Oct; 36(10):553-68. PubMed ID: 12428306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective Evaluation of Treatment Planning for Dental Implant.
    Kim SG; Hasselgren G; Alexander S; Lee SW; Solomon C
    J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(2):25-30. PubMed ID: 26562980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients with 3-dimensional dentofacial records.
    Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 28554454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Agreement analysis of subjective evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome].
    Song GY; Li WR; Geng Z; Xu TM
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 44(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 22353911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational formulation of orthodontic tooth-extraction decisions. Part I: to extract or not to extract.
    Takada K; Yagi M; Horiguchi E
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 19705936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Italy.
    Angelillo IF; Nobile CG; Pavia M
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Oct; 24(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 8954220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic treatment following orthognathic surgery: how long does it take and why? A retrospective study.
    Luther F; Morris DO; Karnezi K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1969-76. PubMed ID: 17884524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence and impact of previous orthodontic treatment in patients attending orthognathic combined clinics: a survey.
    Khamashta-Ledezma L; Collier J; Sharma PK; Ali N
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 50(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 22153182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.