These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10321157)

  • 1. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with insight and ultraspeed films.
    Güngör K; Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Celik I; Semiz M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 15765958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE; Davari A; Goodarzipour D; Goodarzipour K; Fallahzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 10460962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Naitoh M; Yuasa H; Toyama M; Shiojima M; Nakamura M; Ushida M; Iida H; Hayashi M; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9474624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.
    Deep P; Petropoulos D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003; 69(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 12880556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study.
    Baltacioglu IH; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):130. PubMed ID: 29145846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of artificial intelligence application for dental caries diagnosis on intraoral bitewing and periapical radiographs.
    Szabó V; Szabó BT; Orhan K; Veres DS; Manulis D; Ezhov M; Sanders A
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105105. PubMed ID: 38821394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.