These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1032125)

  • 1. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 1032125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data.
    Atkinson JC; Rodi SB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nystatin allergy. Petrolatum is not the optimal vehicle for patch testing.
    de Groot AC; Conemans JM
    Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 2302855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patch testing with nickel chloride in a hydrogel.
    Fullerton A; Menné T; Hoelgaard A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2914431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing.
    Väänänen A; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elicitation thresholds for thiuram mix using petrolatum and ethanol/sweat as vehicles.
    Knudsen BB; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):410-3. PubMed ID: 8879927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Water versus petrolatum as vehicle for patch testing methylisothiazolinone + methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG).
    de Groot AC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):300-1. PubMed ID: 2383991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects.
    Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Rastogi SC; Menne T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Mar; 34(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 8833458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corticosteroid contact hypersensitivity: what vehicle and concentration?
    Wilkinson SM; Beck MH
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 May; 34(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 8807220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B; Niklasson B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):268-78. PubMed ID: 6525820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water versus petrolatum for testing imidazolidinyl urea.
    Foussereau J; Cavelier C
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jul; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 2805661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (PPD) by patch testing with PPD 0.3% in petrolatum.
    Geier J; Ballmer-Weber BK; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Bircher A; Weisshaar E; Hillen U
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jul; 69(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23782355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further studies of effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in experimental contact sensitization testing in humans.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 7398265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a perfect vehicle(s) for diagnostic patch testing: an overview.
    Chiang A; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2013 Mar; 32(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 22667342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes.
    Frosch PJ; Pilz B; Andersen KE; Burrows D; Camarasa JG; Dooms-Goossens A; Ducombs G; Fuchs T; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Nov; 33(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 8565489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methylchloroisothiazolinone-methylisothiazolinone reactions in patients screened for vehicle and preservative hypersensitivity.
    Rietschel RL; Nethercott JR; Emmett EA; Maibach HI; Storrs FJ; Larsen WG; Adams RM; Taylor JS; Marks JG; Mitchell JC
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1990 May; 22(5 Pt 1):734-8. PubMed ID: 2347960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sesquiterpene lactone mix patch testing supplemented with dandelion extract in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis and non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
    Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Mimica-Dukić N; Boza P; Vujanović Lj; Duran V; Stojanović S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 15479198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitization to yellow petrolatum used as a vehicle for patch testing.
    Dooms-Goossens A; Degreef H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 7398273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitizing potential of 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
    Clemmensen S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Apr; 12(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 4017569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.