These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1032126)
1. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data. Atkinson JC; Rodi SB Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans. Marzulli FN; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 1032125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing. Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nystatin allergy. Petrolatum is not the optimal vehicle for patch testing. de Groot AC; Conemans JM Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 2302855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch testing with nickel chloride in a hydrogel. Fullerton A; Menné T; Hoelgaard A Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2914431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing. Väänänen A; Hannuksela M Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Water versus petrolatum as vehicle for patch testing methylisothiazolinone + methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG). de Groot AC Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):300-1. PubMed ID: 2383991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guinea pig allergy tests: an overview. Andersen KE; Maibach HI Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Nov; 1(3):43-66. PubMed ID: 3916138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Water versus petrolatum for testing imidazolidinyl urea. Foussereau J; Cavelier C Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jul; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 2805661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch testing with primin in white petrolatum. Schubert HJ; Prater E; Sell M Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):286. PubMed ID: 4085239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination. McLelland J; Shuster S Br J Dermatol; 1990 May; 122(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 2354115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ring-shaped positive allergic patch test reactions to allergens in liquid vehicles. Lachapelle JM; Tennstedt D; Fyad A; Masmoudi ML; Nouaigui H Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Apr; 18(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 3378431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig. Björkner B; Niklasson B Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):268-78. PubMed ID: 6525820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol. Andersen KE; Carlsen L; Egsgaard H; Larsen E Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 4085224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch test results with standard allergens over a decade. Young E; Houwing RH Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 3652697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of suitable concentrations for patch testing of various fragrance materials. A summary of a group study conducted over a 6-year period. Mid-Japan Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Dermatol; 1984 Feb; 11(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 6376573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]