349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10321299)
1. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?].
van Vloten WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):652-3. PubMed ID: 10321294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the number of genital chlamydial infections in the United States.
Judson FN
J Reprod Med; 1985 Mar; 30(3 Suppl):269-72. PubMed ID: 4020783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for chlamydia in general practice.
Heal C; Jones B; Veitch C; Lamb S; Hodgens S; Browning S; Butler H; Carey M
Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 31(8):779-82. PubMed ID: 12189675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Risk factors for Clamydia infections of the genital organs in adolescent females].
Sedlecki K; Markovic M; Rajic G
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(7-8):169-74. PubMed ID: 11797445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence, epidemiological and clinical correlates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Tchoudomirova K; Nuhov P; Tchapanova A
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 1998 Nov; 11(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 9883432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opportunistic screening of young men for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in general practice.
Andersen B; Eidner PO; Hagensen D; Lomborg S; Hoff G
Scand J Infect Dis; 2005; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15764188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia in young men.
Hince D; Brett T; Mak D; Bulsara M; Moorhead R; Arnold-Reed D
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Sep; 38(9):734-7. PubMed ID: 19893805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.
Powell J; O'Connor C; O'hlarlaithe M; Saunders J; De Freitas J
Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 15459401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection: risk factors].
Douvier S; Sainte-Barbe C; Oudot C; Habert F; Fritz MT
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1996 May; 24(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 8704819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits.
Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Pare B; Clark KL; Ellis DA; Hendrix RM; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC
N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 9731090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-infection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients presenting to the genitourinary medicine clinic in Portsmouth: the chlamydia screening pilot study - three years on.
Lee VF; Tobin JM; Harindra V
Int J STD AIDS; 2004 Nov; 15(11):744-6. PubMed ID: 15537461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection among young women in Costa Rica.
Porras C; Safaeian M; González P; Hildesheim A; Silva S; Schiffman M; Rodríguez AC; Wacholder S; Freer E; Quint K; Bratti C; Espinoza A; Cortes B; Herrero R;
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 May; 35(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 18446086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
