These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10321337)
1. Good intentions. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):26-7. PubMed ID: 10321337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight. Fowler HL Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis. Gross GS Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lengthening the stem: allowing federally funded researchers to derive human pluripotent stem cells from embryos. Casell JH Univ Mich J Law Reform; 2001; 34(3):547-72. PubMed ID: 16538744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A word to the wise. Palca J Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(2):5. PubMed ID: 8026940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruling may free NIH to fund stem cells studies. Marshall E Science; 1999 Jan; 283(5401):465, 467. PubMed ID: 9988645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections. Momeyer RW Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The stem cell debate. Dasgupta S Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12199296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress. Annas GJ; Caplan A; Elias S Nat Med; 1999 Dec; 5(12):1339-41. PubMed ID: 10581063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Private ethics boards and public debate. Tauer CA Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 10321344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryonic stem-cell research exempt from ban, NIH is told. Wadman M Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6716):185-6. PubMed ID: 9930681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos. George EP Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethicists urge funding for extraction of embryo cells. Wadman M Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):292. PubMed ID: 10360560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bush is a threat to US stem-cell research. Cimons M Nat Med; 2001 Mar; 7(3):263. PubMed ID: 11231603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research on embryonic tissue, ethics, and congressional inquiry. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 11657559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Destructive stem-cell research on human embryos. Doerflinger R Origins; 1999 Apr; 28(45):769, 771-773. PubMed ID: 11660699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The pedagogical significance of the Bush stem cell policy: a window into bioethical regulation in the United States. Snead OC Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):491-504. PubMed ID: 15742591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US panel firms up views on embryo research. Gershon D Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6484):8. PubMed ID: 8015615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH gets the green light on embryo research. Gavaghan H Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6496):370. PubMed ID: 8090213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]